Captain Obvious

Joined

• started 17 topics
• posted 886 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Captain Obvious

• 
  82

  Are YOU a Believer, Atheist, Agnostic, Active JW or WHAT?

  by Greybeard in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  sorry if this has been asked before but i would love to know the current ratio on this forum.. i'm a believer/christian former jw for 45 years... born in .

  what are you now and what were you?.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Captain Obvious

  I, for one would love to see a thread where Cofty and SBF go at it. It wouldn't accomplish anything, but would sure be interesting.

  Oh and I prefer the term 'Secular Humanist.'
• 
  33

  "Why would everyone be included this time...unless something special is about to happen?"

  by Separation of Powers in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so, i am talking to a long time friend, you know, the non-judgmental type that doesn't really mind that i don't go to many meetings and am never out in service.

  he tells me that the annual meeting is coming up and that the whole congregation is invited...well, at least the active "approved" whole congregation.

  he speaks with an excitement that puzzles me, like he just got invited to the locker room of his favorite football team when they won the superbowl.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Captain Obvious

  I'm with Bungi Bill, likely much ado about nothing. The GB likes to put shit like this together to excite the masses, only to scoop out the same old crap. Just think of every "special talk" you have ever heard.
• 
  11

  "New Light" Annual Meeting Oct 2013" Olive Branch Extended To Apostates and Unfaithful JWs.

  by AuntConnie in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  it's absurd to think jehovah's slave should take heed or listen to advice from the ever growing mob leaving the organization.

  still, it's your problem you can't keep pace with our present truth as we continue to evolve.

  why should we listen to the the vast army of apostates and evil slaves, they don't want a gente, more humble org, they need to fight fire with fire!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Captain Obvious

  Aunt Connie, you are the best kind of apostate. Keep it up
• 
  29

  Am I in a "cool hall " or what?

  by ?me? in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  anybody else in the situation i am?

  me and the wife go to a hall that is pretty "hands off".

  i have not really been out in service for probably 1.5 years and my wife has went out maybe 3 times in the last year.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Captain Obvious

  Yeah I hear you there buddy. I haven't been in service for a good year and a half, and attend probably 15% of the meetings. Wife gets to probably 40% and goes in service once a month. She's a 'social witness' and I'm doing my best to hide my hatred for religion. The good friends we do have are super coolinto go on vacations together, and think nothing of skipping meetings and going away for the weekend instead.

  The weird part? The elders are completely leaving us alone! We had a shep call like 10 months ago to 'encourage' me, that's it. Do you get the 'its nice to see you here' handshakes when you do go to the hall?

  "Spiritually immature" my ass!

  Is your wife still a believer? If not how did you get through to her?
• 
  18

  THE DIVORCE OF THE CENTURY!

  by JW GoneBad in

  1. forum
  2. suggestions

  so there is a rumor going around about 1914 and its possible demise!.

  i cant help but think of the many and i say many divorces (not to make light of the matter) that jw families have had to deal with among their ranks over the years.. however, knowing how long the wtbts and 1914 have been together and the thought of mother (wtbts) doing away with her man (1914) after nearly 100 years of marriage is truly heart breaking for some.

  many old-timers probably still think of the old days when they were like any other happy couple; inseparable, always holding hands, romantic and the like.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Captain Obvious

  Read the july 15th WT... They won't be dropping 1914 anytime soon
• 
  43

  Not all believers in a creator are dumb, may be deaf, so accomplished atheist explain this:--

  by prologos in

  1. forum
  2. tech-support
  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Captain Obvious

  But WHY? If owl done concedes to your idea of a benefactor, how long till you're trying to steer that person towards the god of the bible?

  Besides... The oxygen/carbon ratios have changed many times through history. Just because our air is food for us now doesn't mean if air was a bit different, we couldn't have evolved to breathe that air perfectly. How things fit together is not evidence of any creator, just of our evolution working properly. Evolution didn't need someone to help it start, because by its very nature it makes things work out or die.

  In summary, your question is pointless. Good try, keep thinking and searching. The truth is right under your nose
• 
  371

  Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt

  by QC in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.

  this is a game changer.

  the bomb!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Captain Obvious

  Well said, jgnat. The title and OP of this thread, as well as every post by the OP have been dripping with arrogance.. The worst kind of arrogance. I'm glad the OP didn't retreat into the realm of "warm fuzzy feelings" or "Christ this and that." He outright challenged a very established and proven scientific system saying we need to "get current" and read this silly book written by a fool. It is full of the same garbage pseudo science creationist books have always had. Not a single rational argument among them. So far, I don't see the scientific community in an uproar, rewriting textbooks and throwing away decades worth of research all because of under qualified preacher wrote a book.

  The OP then goes on to ignore all of the well written rebuttals to his nonsense, and cut and paste more of this garbage. You see, this thread would have been a big eye opener for me when I was waking up. Even if it didn't make me disbelieve the bible, it would have made me dig deeper to find the truth. It is for this reason that anyone posts on this thread still at all.
• 
  19

  What is new about the Candace Conti trial

  by smiddy in

  1. watchtower
  2. child-abuse

  whats new in the latest developments.

  smiddy.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Captain Obvious

  Regardless of whether its from donations or the $800+ million proceeds from sales of Brooklyn property, it is still a win. If Candace were to donate a portion to SNAP, it would be a very valuable investment. Let's not forget that she deserves every nickel she gets. Hopefully she can invest it wisely and she and her family can benefit from it for decades or more.
• 
  371

  Design or Non-Design, finally we know, Darwin's Doubt

  by QC in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  if you want to read the definitive explanation on fossils and how life arrived its covered in darwins doubt, by s.c. meyer.

  this is a game changer.

  the bomb!.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Captain Obvious

  Bla bla bla bla.

  Hey QC, once Adam's wrong free will choice is corrected, what happens the next time someone willingly (not out of ignorance like Adam's sin was.. He was set up to fail according to Genesis) sins? Let's look into the future shall we? I am a perfect, blameless man freed from sin by Jesus. (I'll assume that we'll still have men making up rules for us to follow) I decide to sin privately... Later that night my wife and I fool around (as we often do) and she gets preggers.

  Regardless of whether I am forgiven or not, is sin passed on to my child? Am I to be destroyed, devastating my wife and child? I know this is OT, but I'm curious how the hard headed believer like yourself works these things out... Considering you have no issues making up all sorts of excuses for your god.
• 
  16

  A baby to be sacrificed on the alter of Jehovah thwarted by New Zealands High Court.

  by smiddy in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the herald sun newspaper article titled "jehovahs baby rule " "a sick babyis under the guardianship of new zealand`s high court so she can receive life-saving blood transfusions.......she could develop life-threatening complications without a transfusion.. to be fair the article also states "she has been given a 90 per cent survival rate with treatment,but is likely to need a blood transfusion-which her parents will not allow as they are jehovah`s witnesses.. my observations /concerns are this : jehovah`s witnesses refuse blood transfusions.a baptised jw who takes a blood transfusion can/will be disfellowshiped for not abiding by jw`s doctrine.going against gb policy direction is causing division.. jehovah`s witnesses do not beleive in donating blood to a blood bank even if it is theirs for their own private exclusive use .. official teaching on blood by jehovah`s witnesses is, it is not to be stored, it is to be poured out on the ground.it is not to be used for any purpose.. jehovah`s witnesses will not use blood and bone in their gardens,they will not eat blood sausage,and a married couple will certainly not engage in sexual activity when the wife is menstruating.. the dilemma/inconsistencys :why is it only a conscience matter, no penaltys applied for anyone to accept every fraction of blood that is donated by other people.?

  they will use blood that is donated by other people , processed in a laboratory into various fractions and injected into their own bodies , and they dont see a problem with this hypocricy ?

  double standards ?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Captain Obvious

  Good. I hope the little girl grows up into a beautiful, intelligent apostate.